Death Penalty helps to reduce the criminal element or population of those unable to adapt to a non-violent society. Since Life Sentances dont deter future criminals from killing and murdering others in society, the death penalty is needed to discourage others from harming the values of a civilized society by removing any hope of ever being free to do harm after they commit a haneous act against another. The fact about pro and con death penalty is that neither view has discoraged people from killing, so instead of filling prisons with people who cannot return to society or trying to reform people who didn't care for another human beings civil rights, then remove the criminal from the equation. The crime rate and especially violent crime rate has only increased in the past so it doesn't make sense to keep pretending that deterence works.
Arguments against the Death Penalty You are here: Arguments against the Death… The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding.
However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.
The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.
Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken.
These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender.
The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty.
Once again, this is a separate issue. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing.
The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment.
The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.
If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.
As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.
Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve.
It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees.The death penalty, used from and fully abolished in , was said to have cut crimes by two thirds.
It is a controversial topic ever since it was created. It has taken the lives of guilty and innocent parties. In a recent survey 70% or the public want the death penalty reinstated for heavy [ ]. Capital Punishment Discursive essay Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a person as a punishment for an offence.
Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. Death Penalty Death penalty, commonly known as capital punishment is a process by the law where an individual is killed for an offence punishable by the state through such means.
The judicial directive that an individual be given a death penalty leads to an execution in the actual enforcement. Published: Mon, 5 Dec Capital punishment, which some also call the death penalty, has been around in society for hundreds of years.
Ever since it began, there have been discussions as to whether it is morally right, and as to whether it actually deters criminals. English Task –Argumentative Essay The Death Penalty The argument of whether the death penalty is effective is an age-old and contentious issue.
Oct 17, · The death penalty costs much more than life in prison, mostly because of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.
The death penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst initiativeblog.com: Resolved.